TOEIC LinkPublished April 30, 2026

TOEIC Link vs Eiken — A Four-Axis Comparison Across Skills, CEFR, Resume Use, and Cost

In Japan the two main four-skill English tests are TOEIC Link and the Eiken Test in Practical English Proficiency. Both are mapped to CEFR, but they differ sharply on three things: scoring model (continuous scale vs pass/fail levels), test format (CAT vs fixed items), and resume notation (CEFR + score vs level name like "Grade Pre-1"). Treating "Eiken Grade Pre-1 = TOEIC Link CEFR B2" as a hard equivalence often causes silent failures when applying for university programs, jobs, or study abroad. This page lines up the two on the four axes that actually matter and gives a four-question decision flow that resolves to one test in 90 seconds.

Eiken and TOEIC Link — different evaluation models

Eiken is a level-based certification run by the Eiken Foundation of Japan, with seven grades: 5 / 4 / 3 / Pre-2 / 2 / Pre-1 / 1. Each grade has a two-stage format: Stage 1 (Reading + Listening + Writing) and Stage 2 (Speaking interview), with a binary pass/fail outcome at each grade. TOEIC Link, by contrast, is a four-skill scaled test from ETS — each skill scored 0–25 with a CEFR band from Pre-A1 through C1. There is no "passing line" — Link reports your current position and the gap to the next band, which is structurally suited to ongoing self-monitoring.

Recognition in Japan favors Eiken: roughly 4 million test takers per year, with deep integration into school recommendations, university admissions, and teacher hiring. For domestic admissions and hiring, Eiken Grade 2 or higher is effectively the standard. TOEIC Link is the newer four-skill test and is gaining traction with multinationals, foreign-affiliated employers, and study-abroad applications — for global requirements that explicitly ask for CEFR, Link tends to be the better fit.

  • Eiken: level-based (Grade 5 to 1), Stage 1 + Stage 2 interview, pass/fail
  • TOEIC Link: four-skill scale (0–25 per skill + CEFR), CAT, continuous evaluation
  • Eiken recognition: ~4M test takers per year, embedded in admissions / hiring
  • Link recognition: multinationals, study abroad, CEFR-based requirements
  • Skills evaluated: both cover Reading / Listening / Writing / Speaking
  • Key differences: scoring model (level vs scale) and resume use (grade vs CEFR)

Four-axis comparison — time, price, format, intended use

The biggest structural difference is granularity of evaluation and re-take cost. Eiken offers three sittings per year at main test sites plus S-CBT for on-demand testing, but failing a grade leaves only "Pre-1 fail" — no CEFR score is officially attached. Link runs on CAT and always returns a CEFR band plus a 0–25 score per skill, so it is structurally suited to self-monitoring across multiple sittings.

Prices as of April 2026: Eiken Grade Pre-1 is 10,500 yen, Grade 2 is 9,100 yen at main sites, Link is 7,920 yen. Link is roughly 25–35% cheaper, and finishes in 90 minutes versus Eiken's two-day flow (Stage 1 90 min + Stage 2 8 min). For "take it 3–4 times per year and watch the trajectory" use cases, Link wins. For "pass once, list a credential" use cases, Eiken wins.

  • Eiken Grade Pre-1: 10,500 yen / Stage 1 90 min + Stage 2 8 min / pass-fail / CEFR ~B2
  • Eiken Grade 2: 9,100 yen / Stage 1 85 min + Stage 2 7 min / pass-fail / CEFR ~B1
  • TOEIC Link: 7,920 yen / 90 min / 0–25 per skill + CEFR Pre-A1 to C1
  • Eiken format: two-stage, fixed items, paper or S-CBT
  • Link format: four skills in one session, CAT, CBT delivery
  • Cadence: Eiken 3 main sittings/yr + S-CBT / Link on-demand (test centers)

A 4-question decision flow — 90 seconds to one test

Four questions in order resolve the choice. Q1: Is the requirement domestic admissions / teacher hiring / Japanese grad school? → Yes leads to Eiken; No leads to Q2. Q2: Does the requirement explicitly use CEFR? → Yes leads to Link; No leads to Q3. Q3: Do you need to track current four-skill position closely? → Yes leads to Link; No leads to Q4. Q4: Does the resume need an explicit credential name like "Grade Pre-1"? → Yes leads to Eiken; No leads to Link.

This resolves about 85% of cases. The remaining 15% is the "multinational job that asks CEFR B2, plus a Japanese grad school that requires Eiken Grade 2 or above" — the two-test combination. Eiken provides a credential certificate, Link provides a continuous score — depending on the use case, holding both is the most practical strategy.

  • Q1 — Domestic admissions / teacher hiring / Japanese grad school: Yes → Eiken; No → Q2
  • Q2 — Requirement explicitly uses CEFR (multinational / study abroad): Yes → Link; No → Q3
  • Q3 — Need close tracking of four-skill current position: Yes → Link; No → Q4
  • Q4 — Resume needs an explicit credential name like Grade Pre-1: Yes → Eiken; No → Link
  • Two-test combo: Eiken Grade 2+ plus Link CEFR B2+ (covers domestic and global)
  • When in doubt: Eiken for domestic-track, Link for global-track

Four common mistakes to clear before sitting

The four common failure modes are: (1) writing "Grade Pre-1 = CEFR B2" and submitting an Eiken transcript to a multinational that asked for CEFR — CEFR is not on the official transcript so the application is bounced; (2) submitting Link CEFR B2 to a Japanese grad school that asked specifically for "Eiken Grade 2 or above" — no Eiken grade name on file, requirement unmet; (3) failing Eiken Grade Pre-1 and walking away with no CEFR score — paying twice for the next attempt; (4) writing "Link CEFR B2 (~ Eiken Grade Pre-1)" on a resume — recruiters reject the equivalence as not objective.

Mistakes (1) and (4) come from the equivalence not being formally objective. Both the Eiken Foundation and ETS publish CEFR mappings as guidelines on their official sites, but HR and admissions offices generally do not accept these guidelines as automatic conversions. The safe approach is to take the test that the requirement document literally names, and submit the original document — never convert.

  • Mistake 1: Eiken Pre-1 transcript submitted as "CEFR B2" abroad → no CEFR on the document, rejected
  • Mistake 2: Link CEFR B2 submitted to grad school requiring "Eiken Grade 2+" → no grade on file, requirement unmet
  • Mistake 3: Eiken Pre-1 fail leaves no CEFR record → re-take cost paid twice
  • Mistake 4: Resume reads "Link B2 (~ Eiken Pre-1)" → equivalence rejected as subjective
  • Right approach: take the test the requirement literally names
  • Fix: never convert — always submit the original transcript or score report

Four-axis comparison — Eiken vs TOEIC Link

FieldEiken Grade 2Eiken Grade Pre-1TOEIC Link
Price (incl. tax, main site)9,100 yen10,500 yen7,920 yen
TimeStage 1 85m + Stage 2 7mStage 1 90m + Stage 2 8m90m (single session)
Scoring modelPass / failPass / fail0–25 each + CEFR
CEFR guideline~B1~B2Pre-A1 to C1 (direct)
FormatFixed items (paper / S-CBT)Fixed items (paper / S-CBT)CAT (adaptive CBT)
Intended useDomestic admissions / high schoolTeacher hiring / domestic gradMultinational / study abroad / 4-skill tracking

* Prices are at main test sites as of April 2026. Eiken can be taken on demand via S-CBT; TOEIC Link is delivered on demand at test centers. CEFR guidelines reflect the official mappings published by the Eiken Foundation and ETS — they are guidelines, not automatic conversions.

Three checks when the Eiken vs Link choice stalls

  • Check the requirement document (admissions, job listing, study-abroad criteria) — does it literally use the word "Eiken", "CEFR", or "TOEIC"?
  • Pick by cadence: once-per-year pass/fail (Eiken) vs every three months trajectory (Link)
  • Resume use: which format fits — "Eiken Grade Pre-1" or "TOEIC Link Speaking B2 (April 2026)"?

Frequently Asked Questions

Related articles

TOEIC® and TOEIC Link™ are registered trademarks of ETS. Eiken® (the Eiken Test in Practical English Proficiency) is a registered trademark of the Eiken Foundation of Japan. EnglishBlitz is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or associated with ETS or the Eiken Foundation. Prices, durations, and CEFR mappings reflect publicly available information from the Eiken Foundation and ETS as of April 2026 — confirm current specifications on the official sites.